<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google taking on Wikipedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2007/12/14/google-taking-on-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2007/12/14/google-taking-on-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Kevin Dangoor on Software Development</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bicking</title>
		<link>http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2007/12/14/google-taking-on-wikipedia/#comment-207682</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bicking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2007/12/14/google-taking-on-wikipedia/#comment-207682</guid>
		<description>Interesting; there's a lot of information that really isn't appropriate for Wikipedia, and building communities around subtopics where you can go into more depth is hard.  OTOH, something like "Insomnia" (their example) *is* an excellent candidate for Wikipedia.  As is any general topic that isn't timely, as the collective management of the topic is what makes the initial investment really worth it (at least for anyone who has gained the humility to realize that they can't indefinitely maintain much content).  

And for smaller topics there is always blogs.

Hmm... I think I've pretty much talked myself out of Knol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting; there&#8217;s a lot of information that really isn&#8217;t appropriate for Wikipedia, and building communities around subtopics where you can go into more depth is hard.  OTOH, something like &#8220;Insomnia&#8221; (their example) *is* an excellent candidate for Wikipedia.  As is any general topic that isn&#8217;t timely, as the collective management of the topic is what makes the initial investment really worth it (at least for anyone who has gained the humility to realize that they can&#8217;t indefinitely maintain much content).  </p>
<p>And for smaller topics there is always blogs.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; I think I&#8217;ve pretty much talked myself out of Knol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.251 seconds -->
